I was so irritated by Pete Hamill's "review" of the new Willie Mays biography that I wrote a letter to The New York Times Book Review.

Yesterday the Book Review ran three letters about the review, none of them mine. One was from a man in San Francisco writing about home runs and Candlestick Park (they don't name stadiums like they used to). The other two were from New Yorkers. The first began: "My eyes welled up with tears as I read Pete Hamill's beautiful review..." and ended with the words "which might be the difference between Harlem and the Bronx." The second ended with the sentence: "That was New York."

As in the review, the greatest baseball player in history took a backseat to the vainest city in the world.

By Thomas Swick • Category: sports, media

No feedback yet

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)